A hard habit to break.
In the most recent standoff between teacher unions and the
politicians who no longer love them, the American public got another story that
featured the cost of education. Major
media outlets, along with Facebook, Twitter, and the blogosphere were riddled
with voices from what boils down to two sides:
A: SCHOOLS SHOULD COST LESS
B: SCHOOLS SHOULD COST MORE
A: SCHOOLS SHOULD COST LESS
B: SCHOOLS SHOULD COST MORE
Sure, in Chicago, in the battle itself, the argument has
been about teacher evaluation, class size, and instructional time. But for most people outside the immediate
fray, it’s all about the benjamins.
The war has damaged teaching and education-- and left a lot of school kids holding the bag. This problem is not going away, either. But how did we get here?
Who is really at war? As a
teacher, I have a pretty good view of the battle. Here’s the way I see the
players.
“Smaller
Government” Politicians
BACKSTORY: Since the “Industrialization” model of Public Education
became the way of doing business, the government has been incentivized to
provide as little money and resources for teachers as possible. It’s simply
never been popular to pay for great public teaching in America.
MUSCLE TO FLEX: Politicians interested in election often promise
to tighten up public budgets. This is
true on both sides of the political spectrum, although Republicans have built
their house on it. Because teacher pay represents the single greatest piece of
the education money pie, promising to pay teachers less for more has been a
Conservative institution—and has won more than a few elections for the GOP.
WHY THEY’RE GREAT: These
guys won’t let you forget that public schools can be depressingly
inefficient—and they’re right a lot of the time. Those of us who work in public schools have
no shortage of anecdotes of financial waste or professional mediocrity. Show me
a lousy school and I’ll show you a community that isn’t holding its public
school accountable.
KRYPTONITE: Paying
less for teachers has proven to do little to attract or maintain talented
professionals. Sure, bargain hunting is
attractive, but saving on teacher pay has basically devalued the worth of great
teachers and, ultimately, quality instruction itself.
Teacher Unions
BACKSTORY: The battles of the 60’s-70’s yielded some big
wins for teacher unions. Teacher pay
went from staggeringly low to pretty good in many places around the
country. Unions fought for better
working conditions, smaller class sizes, and
professional respect.
MUSCLE TO FLEX: A steam engine during elections, teacher unions
have been the bedrock to the greatest wins of the Democratic party of the last
50 years. If you are a liberal or
progressive running for a big office, you probably won’t win without the
teacher unions at your back.
WHY THEY’RE GREAT: Strong unions are the only players to
have consistently fought for the biggest incentive for great teaching: better wages and working conditions. When you hear about people fighting for
better learning environments in public schools, its probably from the mouth of
a union leader. No other entity has done more to help teachers do the work of
teaching.
KRYPTONITE: To rally
the teachers into a force to be reckoned with, Unions made a sacred pact to
leave no tenured colleague unprotected.
This has meant that great instructors get no more or less protection
than absolutely horrible teachers. Mr.
Franey, my high school science teacher who used to swig “cough medicine” in
between periods. He was a mess—and you
had at least one as bad. Teacher quality
control is in a Twilight Zone of mediocrity—and teacher unions deserve a lot of
blame.
The Bottom Line?
Unlike the beatdown they got in Wisconsin a couple of years
ago, teacher unions earned a bit of a win in Chicago. But it’s a small glimmer in darkness ahead for
school unions, however, and the window for union survival will not stay open
forever.
But this ain’t about Chicago or Wisconsin. The real cost of this argument has roots that
go much further down into our culture. The greater problem is that Americans have little faith in the greatness of American public education. We don’t value quality education. We don’t value great teachers. This lack of confidence drags on almost every aspect of our culture.
It is unlikely that politicians will fix public
education. With economy as it is,
running a campaign on MORE money for schools will lose many more races than it wins—even
for staunch Democrats.
Unions must retool in order to stay involved in the
conversation. If they can figure out how
to cut the weight of protecting lousy teachers, they might be able to unravel
this knot. It’s proven to be a hard
habit to break.
Until then, unions will continue to lose the war, even if they
win a battle like Chicago.